Thursday, September 14, 2006

Simmering It Is All About Simmering

The excerpt of any existence is the accompanying reality, we mean by that, that we take exemption to anything that you might imply to yourself other than what you have implied in your communion and events with others, so that your history cannot be a self inflicted autobiography, a conjuring of self events, it must be contextual to the events that have transpired conjoined with the life and happenings, and others not excluding the things in universe, planets and suns, you have a relationship to the Sun in that you transform its energy into life form, you have a relationship with plant life in that you transform its eco system in a very metered transmission of matter, then you have a relationship that is more kindred to fish and cows and bears and so forth, these are what actually embed you into the concept of existence, and so your autonomy or the autonomy of anything is none existent, not negligent but none existent because the universe doesn’t end its sentences.

Still even as that is the case there must be something to your existence that is somehow independent of what universe is and what plants are, and what chickens, pigs and cows are besides pork, milk and eggs. Else why would you be reading this book and why aren’t cows reading this book?

Ah the enigma of existence is so tiring it almost doesn’t last, this is why we don’t go around asking ourselves philosophical questions, they are long winded, they are boring, and they don’t have any plausible meaning, but they do have some meaning, it is the implausible meaning, they can connect us to something that we are not connected with, philosophy does endear us to things that are a little bit more untouchable than the atom, the atom might or might not depend on these things too, there really is no way of knowing this, the truth has never been obtainable and will never be obtainable, you just have to decide what will be the truth that causes you to persists and if you are more or less correct and everyone else is more or less in agreement with you, you are likely to happen as a subject being; but it would be strenuous to say that your existence is any basis for truth and much less genuine still to say that you could formulate a fundamental and none devolving truth, we cannot say that with any certainty and we will thus not.

However there you are reading this and here I am writing it, that presupposes any number of things, all of which are temporary and valid truths, and so here we come to some conclusions about you, and some conclusions about me, and some conclusions about universe and some conclusions about the about that we are about.

You exist? Well if existence is a shared experience and all things connected embody that existence and are all representational entities of each other and in essence speak different aspects of self, then we will affirm that, you exist. You exist as a voice, as a conscious agent in the material, you exist as energy transferred from a cow, you exist as part of the back ground radiated energy of the universe, you exist in situational essence as a physical possession of body as attributed to soul, you exist in relationship to your children and are allowed to persists in accordance to social and physical laws which reverse embody their existence from accordance with yours, we can thus affirm that you exist, and exist as much as that representation of all those things is valid, if it isn’t then you don’t exist and something else is valid.

Part of me writing this book and part of you reading it is so that we can stay on message, by the time this book gets written the message has been hardwired and it is a little late to change it except by appearance, when humanity is ready to live the next cycle of its own expression there is nothing to be done but listen, we have listened but it doesn’t matter if we don’t, we are after all inherently on message, the rules cannot be violated from this level of play, if they are we are dead, and that leads to another set of default endeavors, in life as in an after life there are any number of rules, the consequences tend to be generated by those preset rules, yes the universe and quantum have the potential to be many things, but at any given time a given expression is in favor, there is but naught else to do but live it, such is the chicanery of existence.

I hope that you dwell upon that criteria, I hope that you replenish your heart to think that the complexity of the interactions leave you with very little choice but to take everything else into consideration, that is next time you act or react, because any affirmation of your existence will be largely dependant on everything else affirming it and maintaining it, and if they fail to do so because they don’t like you, or they don’t like your feel or they don’t like what you have to say, or you are destroying their environment or killing an entire species, then you will fair badly; for we want the dolphin’s eye to remember us, we want the whales to be alive to tell the universe that they saw us, if we register in the brain of a crocodile then that crocodile will tell the universe that it saw us, and if it does so it will help the universe to remember us, just like the universe notices when a mosquito bites us, we want a mosquito to bites us, or we should want that mosquito to bite us because when it does it exchanges the blood samples of us all with us all and simmers blood throughout the species, mosquito dilutes differences, it makes sameness, and when there are more mosquitoes there is equally more chances of there being more us, people like us that is; cockroaches like stark contrast because it gets them notice, when you say, “Yuk there is a cockroach!” you are telling the universe where in time and space there is a cockroach, something’s have to frighten to get noticed, an orchid has to be pretty to live off of airs; it is with some courage that we can say we exist in the city when in order to do so we have to consume the forest, we are still tree cutters just like our ancestors did so 7000 thousand years ago, dwelling on cutting wood persists even in New York city, and so even as New Yorkers are loners and mentally live in very little psychological planets of precise intellectual dimensions, they are still somewhere cutting a thousand trees each, they are still fishing the artic ocean, they are still carving up the diamonds in Africa; and of course this is all delusional because in the end if we don’t support the existence of other life and forms it also means we are not going to support our own existence, a New Yorker is somewhere in the world with his nation’s army, vigilant of defense and offence, the world twists on such enmeshed associations that you must wonder why we fail to notice the intricacies of dependencies all the way up to the metaphysical, all the way down to carbon, all the way to the maximum energy of light, all the way to 274 degrees Celsius below zero, in our universe we are everywhere, so why have we grown so independent, so assured of our self sufficiency even outside of New York?

The answer very much ends this book, simmering. The more things simmer they more they look the same and the less we may discriminate, when mosquitoes bite us and kill those that cannot survive their particular infection they are pruning our species for sameness, there must have been more, many more blood types but for mosquitoes pruning our species, and as our ideas about freedom and independence simmer all to look the same from every angle it is hard and difficult and mostly impossible not to have the same view of freedom and independence as everyone else and when everyone agrees about such things, we will all be free and independent.

Simmering, it is all about simmering.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

What Is Action?

It is a strange question to ask for the word itself action, commands enough air of attention to make a world unto itself. Still we must ask it because it becomes one of the most relevant words in the way that we see the world today even as its very concept is inverted by any reality, that is to say most things are not happening, action is the least aspect of reality but then it beats all other aspects due to its ability to capture spectacle.

Action! Action! is naturally kinetic, we know that, you don’t dare imagine a passive action, there aren’t any, the moment a catalysts excites itself enough to make a difference in any aspect, chemical, biological, emotional, physical, etc., an event is unfolding, an action is taking place, and the very dynamic of such calls a great many other things into effect, and each other thing or entity that is called into action will invariably resist at first, just a little, all things will at first resist any action coming their way to incite them, and this will subtract the forward impetus of such and any action, either in time or space or even in something as common as gossip, the further away from inception, and the more entities it encounters the greater its dismissal potential, thus all action begins at full kinetic potency, and begins to end either through the resistance it encounters through distance and time or through the resistance that it musters through collusions.

What that means is something rather profound and it is an axiomatic conclusion, all action is finite!

Any time you can know something for sure it is a good thing, and this invariably is because infinite energy is not say impossible, but it requires such intense level of participation from so many varying aspects and from so many dimensions and from so many entities that in the end you know someone in the universe, or something in it will invariably offer the resistance necessary to trip up any type of infinite action. This is so because: All infinite actions require that all cosmic entities be in agreement. If any cosmic entity is not going to further stimulate the action and allow it to proceed on in its way with the least amount of resistance possible, so that it can obtain 90 percent infinity, then the action will greater collapse.

When all participants are in agreement you get the longevity of the universe, with any certainty the universe is 80 percent infinite, maybe a little less, but about that, and that is because everything within universe is in agreement with universe and doesn’t have a problem with it and thus doesn’t resist universe or at least resist’s universe as least as it can. So that Sun has nothing but to benefit from the existence of solar systems and galaxies and thus it needs universe and it is not willing or able to question that idea; and the same follows for sentient beings, you have absolutely nothing to benefit from the disappearance of universe; it is in fact your greatest fear, that it could disappear and that is why you tend to believe in an infinite entity that will conspire to recreate universe at will, when the universe puts a period to its long run-on expression.

What can obtain any greater sustainability than the 80% obtained by universe? Interestingly enough the nothingness runs right up to 90 percent infinity or so simply because it offers the least resistance and in fact the nothingness is so resistance free that it is mostly in everything and actually the basic ingredient of us all is nothingness; but because it disperses as quickly as anyone tries to touch it, because it refuses to make a name for itself, because it prefers to simmer and not cause any altercation at all, because it refuses any and all cumulative effects, and because it will not react, it will not be catalysts, then the nothingness is the closest of us all to infinity, 90 percent there for sure. And mind you that this is so because it is the least action.

Now I think that makes us ponder about that additional 10 percent, and it makes us ponder another thing, is the nothingness greater than universe? Obviously so, the universe is 10% less capable of infinity as oppose to the nothingness, and it is a whole 20 percent less capable of infinity overall, so that universe falls short and this is a good thing for us because a subconsciousness is primed in the nothingness and not in universe. That is to say that a subconsciouness like ours is first a subconsciousness and before that a primal desire in the heap of the nothingness as conjured before the idea of universe, so that the universe has to have a subconsciousness of some sort before it even primes itself into existence, that would imply that a subconsciousness is inherent in the nothingness, however undetectable as it ought not register but slightly above any nothingness murmur. That is you cannot touch it there: It is ever to be expressed. It will have to formulate its own expression. That is to say my most dear souls that the primal actions that expresses any type of desire and subconscious essence will have to have the gravitas enough to altercate its own existence! That is it will have to be able to hatch itself, it will have to be able to be a prime mover, it will have to be the recipient of its own self contained, that is non-catalytic reaction, something quite impossible by most measures; and it must; and it must do so precisely all of everything to inquire its action in an instant less than a plank length, that is before time and space.

Now the fact that a prime catalyst and effect agent has to be able to be self primed or that is combustible without oxygen, or persistent without space and time is in itself a duty free feat so that it doesn’t transgress in time-space and so it has an infinite potential to do so, that is to spark the desire of its own existence; that is the probability of its own existence becomes so amazingly possible that it is met over and over again so that you can have an infinite set of universes and an infinite set of essences types, even if they are themselves all finite, or at least 50% finite, because the desire of inception gets coiled and hampered and stuck with the universal entanglements of all the desire expressions living their particular essence circumstance.

Action then is really what we view as effect, because as creatures of space-time we could not possibly view or even imagine prime actions, when something moves without a push, when something moves without a pull, when something can wait forever and still have plenty of time left, when something can divine itself from an absolute nothingness, primed by pure raw desire and thus give entangled impetus to others, even as it will not matter in a meter or matter in matter because everything that diffuses from it is already a sort of dead action, the resulting wave, for we are all the tail end reflection of a prime event, and we cannot look back, our future is forwards, and forwards, but our march is towards the last point of resistance where from exhaustion our primed action will have exulted itself.

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Actualized, Non Actualized and First Spirits

I think we have to think of the self and the self in relationship to the aspect of reincarnation, a troubling process because a lot of people don't believe in reincarnation even as they themselves are reincarnated, that is of course most of them; but that is also not to say that there aren't people that aren't reincarnated, there are "first spirits," and there are "actualized spirits," and then there are spirits that are "none actualized," and so you have these significant variances and they cease to be wholly significant because the very types that you would address on the matter do not themselves believe in it. And that they don't is in fact a sign of good health in their part as it serves no purpose, in this or most any other life to remember all your other lives. Of course we can assume that a god for instance is someone that remembers all his other lives, which would logically include any and all the life of others, you and I and so forth. And we can correctly assume that anyone that remembers more than one life is a being that has reached some form of self realization, and from there it follows that one can acquire the wisdom to deal with the realism brought about my remembrance of things pasts, specially because if you have had more than one life, your very uniqueness is brought into question, I mean which you are you going to like?

Also I think it important to mention this, it is also necessary to take into account that there are individuals that are fully realized even though they do not remember their previous existences, usually these beings are fully realized within a singular existence because they are not at war or shall we say in conflict with their essence being nature as it reflects through present, past or future. These beings can be distinguished because of their certainty of self, however it is difficult to opt to be this type of being, or it might not be desirable for any given set of probable life variables.

We shall thus discuss the aspect of our being then from a more narrowly defined perspective, that is from the aspect of the temporal life that you and we are happening to be experiencing at this time, and hope somehow that that will draw some kind of binary correlation that might be sustainable not only in real life but also in our minds.

In the first we must just put it bluntly, there are people that are born in their times such are the common folk for they don’t have to think about the way they go about their lives; there are people that are born before their times such as prophets or philosophers and they have to thnk and think hard to realize their lives; and there are people that are born after their times such as are historians and diplomats and they can mostly relax as theya re living a priori and just recollecting or acting upon collectables.

The most common is people that are born in their times, these by nature would tend to be the common folk, usually termed as the masses and it could be any of us all, generally what defines the mass is obviously what appears to be their complacency, which it isn’t really, they actually work harder than anyone to produce the modern, or real time current world where all visionaries and archivists must stand upon, but because they, the masses, are usually in agreement with current world affairs or the status quo, and have no incoherence with it, they accept it precisely as it is for what it is, and have not an inkling of an itch to want radical change, fact is they don't want change at all, even if their lot is in a slum or ghetto they are still likely to continue such existence rather than struggle against it. And frankly why would they want to change something that is wholly in agreement with their state of being and their essence priori, they wouldn't. It is only the academics and the visionaries that see the mass as complacent and yet none of them work harder than it to produce and super impose reality upon as all, a must mass for any historian or visionary to process their ridiculous idealisms or philosophies.

The historians love the past because they were born in the tail end or well beyond their times such as paleontologists; historians for their part are gifted at figuring out what happened before, they sense it, they feel it, they have a good ability to intuit historical happenings; people born after their times are easily discerned as anthropologists or evolutionary scientists, or as bureaucrats that can think a memo innovative. They will always be a step behind and they will equally be more gifted at capitalizing on the steady moment to be captured, the none moving participle. These group also comprises a much to be admired lot, the diplomats; they are naturally given to diplomacy because of their sense of history, nothing but a profound insight into the folly and grandeur of history makes a diplomatic essence, and it is magnificent to watch how they are quick to assume a neutral posture in exchange for a trifle piddling, it is in their habit sensitive anachronistic nature to do so.

We come to those born before their time, there are the prophets oh these are a fine lot, you can pile them in with the futurist and even with the optimist or visionaries, no sense of history, no archival fact faults them or slows them down, they have little insight into the pasts and much less into the present which to them is mostly a hindrance, they live for the future and will work aimlessly and tirelessly towards seemingly unobtainable or unrewarding objectives, posterity needs to be greatfull to this lot even as it is the masses that cater to present day reality that cuddle these unfortunates. Obviously in this lot you find a great many, the optimism makes the bull market and the collector of classics, arts, stamps or any other fodder is fully funded on future prospects; consumerism, savagely musters a great deal of faith in an ever reoccurring fountain of finance; and then there are the prophets, that basically count on tomorrow being here, on the earth not dying out from a sudden whatever disruption, the prophets not only bank on the future they dare to predict its outcome, and glory in their tenacity which generally undermines the common or shall we more appropriately call it the current good; why everyone that believes in the future will invariably undermine the present will invariably be a premature future entity.

Now the mass, as much as we want to say something on their behalf there is not much to say as the very idea of "mass" subordinates any demarcation, after all who inst a member of the mass, why even a prophet and a diplomat have to pay rent and utility and transport and medical bills and so they are largely somehow or other tied to the bloody deed of daily existence from which they will generally profit little. But this serves to point to a degree in any of us to be a member of the present, with greater or not tendencies towards the future or past based on our birth occurrence, which may indeed have a bit of folly in it.

Now we have mentioned three character types, those in the mass aggregate that habit the here and now, those in the least great majority that leave in the past, and are therefore conservative, and those in the least of all majority that is all those that live for posterity and have essence types that branch towards the predictive outcome.

It is not however something, as you might imagine predicated on the here and now, it is instead based on their essence priori, that is where they were before their essence manifested into the corporeal body being. Essence as we have said is all-emotive but then there is experienced essence and none experienced essence and then there is essence that has simply experienced something completely different and thus might appear wholly inexperienced thought it isn’t. We shall thus speak of each here according to their categorical alignment.

First spirits are those that come into being for the very first time that is that they never existed in a corporeal physical form and have thus no memory to be had of it and no experience in it. Obviously they will be naive, they just don't know and will just generally not get this life, it takes a couple of times on earth to get it, "firsts spirits" will generally be at a loss, they will make for wonderful poets, musicians, actors, comics, for everything will be so hurtful to them, so primitive, so barbarous, and then there will be others that will make for great movie stars, equally naive but completely thoughtless, based on pure impulse and given to sycophantic attraction because they want to be liked and accepted, obsessive energy their must, but they shall do well when things go well for them but mostly tragic when it goes tragic for them as events, perhaps because of entropy, tend to favor tragic ends, and so many of these will just end up being boring romantics.

None actualized spirits will invariably be spirits that have been around for a while in the general cosmic background, that is that they will have other aspects of representations tied to their essence representation but they will not have manifested on the earth and so they will generally not be precisely a fit, more at odds with the world but will surely have something original to contribute, they will tend to be geniuses, or unique and insightful as leaders or eccentric inventors, this because of their alternate dimensional experience, which allows them to see not only the greater picture but possible outcomes. They will not feel that they belong, life will be generally easy to none actualized spirits, but it will generally be lonely as they will not have a lot in common with the lot except for the obvious fact that they set the premises of future agendas and will suffer preferential treatment for it, while being emotional recluses and socially avoided or miss trusted as misunderstood.

Actualized spirits are obviously the norm, they will have spent a few life times on earth and will not be at great conflict with it, the world will mostly make sense to them and they will just repeat the process of existence without much a do about it, however they will also neglect to acknowledge a great many deeds and be blind to many misdeeds perpetrated against them, by others or even by their own actions, this is the lot that could drop a bomb on another human being and not see any karma-boomerang effect from it, this is the type that will execute the orders give them without flinching and even give the orders themselves; for this lot remorse from a moral perspective is a reconcilable variable, in other words their moral or religious view, and its commandments will allow for variance in behaviors creating a manageable work and live ethic.

Whether or not you are bound or belong to your times is the tough questions, the matter is that timing in the universe is a tough act, there are only so many windows of opportunity to be born, there are only so many options to get the right parents, and even if you pick the right parents and the right era you could still end up in the wrong geography because your timing of reentry into the earth could be muscled by random circumstance, and so the predicate of your existence is based on many subtleties, and some not so subtle outcomes.

The general rule is: if you have lived many lives and you are being reincarnated at the time of the manifestation for a principle that was just in its gestation phase in your last life, then you will fare well because you will have been subjected to a primer of the abject elements in its primordial state, and you will then be born into your time, you will have an intuitable comprehension of the goings and happenings, and will innately react to them without thinking and thus you will have an advantage in such a climate.

If you are born before your times, that is preempted into a world where you don't belong you will be generally discombobulated, you will try to change it, and you might just bring change to it, even if it is through destruction, otherwise you will just be damn good at predicting the future, something that you will always miss out on, just by a little bit.

And finally if you are born after your times, you will be all right, a worse case scenario makes you a conservative, a reactionary, a protectionists, and a best-case scenario an anthropologist, biologist, ecologists and even a wonderful historians.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

Straight and Curved Spiraling Emotive

What does a person feel what does a person feel about others or can a person actually recognize feelings in others?

We start with the premise that all sentient essence is of the same fabric and one of the same throughout its entire corpus, even if there has been fragmentation all parts of the essence instantaneously communicate with all of its parts, and there are no distinctions between parts so as much as something that feels can detect feeling then it feels itself feeling, and has the ability to feel that in any condition of the feeling agent even as it has been disrupted by time and space dilations.

A person cannot feel themselves as an abstract, that is to say that a person cannot imagine themselves without feeling, any creative or even work functional aspects of a person are all based on a feeling that the person has realized or subjugated, in the case of realized it could be a passion and in the case of subjugation it could be a discipline, not forgetting that discipline too can equal a passion as has amply been demonstrated by passionate militaristic characters throughout history.

Any aspect recognition that a person has of themselves and of their environment and of others is inversely proportional to their capacity to feel themselves, the more you feel yourself the more you feel others, the less you feel yourself the less you feel others. In a particular case, the species has seen it as a benefit to have males, that is sentient beings with less potential to feel, that is with a curved emotive so that they can manage harsh environments, males are thus more capable of destruction because they are apparently unfeeling and thus creatively ruthless, but such is not the case, they are in fact destructive because their ability to feel has been curved and so they become violent in order to feel, that is they are trying to find the straightest path to feeling, they are trying to break the limitations of their feelings, something which is acknowledge by their endemic feminine subconscious but cannot be acknowledge by their overt masculine characteristic.

A person then has a two step process for feeling dynamic, one is masculine one is feminine, the humanity has an aspect feel potential differential for both, masculine have curved guidelines for feeling and feminine are allowed to roam free sort of speak as much as they can match their potential without coming to harm from the abstract environment. Both women and men do feel differently and their manifestations are thus different because of the curvature of their feeling potential, a woman can feel in a sort of straight line that is always forward, upward and towards infinity, a male will feel like a curved line that continues to weigh upon itself the more it feels until it finally collapses from seeing its own feelings dangling in front of him.

A person can and will feel others then in relationship to their gender bias, men will feel more the systemic relationships, that is those that can be constructed externally for they see their feelings remote, while women will be perceptive to the social or those that can be felt internally as their feelings are inward and thus a cumulative heap. The association of masculine to feeling is thus external and subject to degree of exhilaration while feminine association will be internal and based largely on emotive tonality, that is inward cohesiveness. This also implies correctly that males entice happiness while women may suffer joy.

There is a supra association that determines all social and civic feeling potential and dynamic. We mean by this that the unison of male-curved-emotive, and female-straight-emotive, will spiral around each other to give the aural presence to the overall feeling potential of the given, relationship, family, group, tribe, culture, society, nation, and civilization culminating in the unison humanity, all which in their own spheres may manifest different emotive quantifications based on the realized potentials of the Straight and Curved Spiraling Emotive. SCSE.

The entire scope of any of these particulars being able to feel themselves or one another is derived from how the emotive manifestations intersect with one another to cumulative effect, and thus as a whole they hold each other captive which is why few if any can escape their times.

It is then possible for us to feel ourselves, and another but only in an inverse absolute, that is how much are we willing to feel, how much are we prepared to stomach the consequences of feeling as a whole, and there are minor discrepancies between the feeling potential of a given group and the individual, that is to say that generally individuals will have marginal and diminutive control of their ability to feel themselves and by consequence one another.

Now regardless of how the manifestation of emotive essence represents itself in the material world the whole of it is based on a prime-emotive, and it will behave always as if it were trying to construct an emotive world, to feel more, to touch more, towards greater expression, this is because the horizon of all sentient beings is emotive, it is ultimately inward looking towards the essence which gave us all our prime desire to exists. And the pretty irony here is that none of the emotive parts seeking to see out there what is within are not going to find it because out there is space and time.