Tuesday, August 22, 2006

The Fem-Emotive & Cosmic Gender

It is strange to have to say this but souls have gender, there are female souls and male souls and androgynous souls but after many a metaphysical essence feeling there can be no doubt that sex is a priori condition based on soul essence!

That is a difficult thing to accept, you want to imagine that the soul is neutral that it is the place where every characteristic becomes one with the whole, but it isn’t souls have gender and once you know that you can deduce many fascinating things. For instance you can deduce that souls are not a prime essence construct, that is to say that souls are not in and of themselves a final deconstructed essence, that is they are neither elemental or fundamental they come from something else, because you have to assume a somatic essence that constitutes souls, and somatic essence cannot have gender.

Why couldn’t we have it that all the universe be gender based as a whole in its entirety? We are not against that, and in fact we are going to say that the universe appears to have gender in the same way that it has polarity, all over and everywhere, however we are going to conclude that something prior to gender also permeates the universe, in the ether, or the Higgs field, either one by name and concept suits us well, but in the Higgs field there isn’t gender, there isn’t polarity, the Higgs field has the ability to interact so as to give mass and dynamic force to entities and so I will say that our Ether, will do same, it may sympathetically manifest male or female or androgynous essence but it has neither to begin with.

Souls have gender, it still doesn’t feel good to think that, not that thinking ever should feel good, but it feels more terrible to think that gender is not something determined at birth, it is in fact a priori of the soul that opts to be born, that means that even as the zygote can technically be purely feminine for the first eight weeks after conception, the reality is that the soul mechanisms that trigger pregnancy have already preprogrammed themselves to kick off the appropriate proteins, amino acids, etc. so as to trigger maleness at the opportune moment such as it is deigned. This will create a problem for biological alterations of the process, it may imply that you can change the biology but it might not transfer to soul, thus you can imagine a female biology with a male soul. Or, and this two may happen there might be enough anticipation that a soul is able to revert or change during the early stages of conception.

Of course one can imagine that if the parents want a little girl that the spirit of a little girl would tend to have an easier tendency and path towards those parents which are manifesting such desire. But there is a sort of damper when that precious requirement meets desire ideals, that is there is a birth dynamic just as much as there is a birth desire, the birth desire is manifested by souls and parents, parents want to have a child, and a soul wishes to be born, there is no shortage of either though there is a physical limitation based on our social and tribal logistical ability to allow for reproduction in accordance with environmental factors. The damper is that when a soul defines its entrance into the cycle dynamic which transfers spirit to world, that is transcurrence, the dynamic follows intent but not too closely so that a soul could end up with the wrong parents, with parents that didn’t want a baby girl but a boy, it could even end up with parents that didn’t want children and suffered the accident of a surprise and this is just counting that the little girl succeeds in being born to the right parents and was not switched at the hospital through the actions of some careless nurse. Plenty of things can go wrong in our universe, plenty.

Now let us take something into consideration, souls are then a manifestation of something else that is manifested from the primal desire scream, and let me apologize because we have to keep on discovering layers and layers before we get to species and humans but it is just part of the process.

The problem is one of the vacuum, there is nothing in empty space, then there is the desire for definition that primes itself out of the nothingness, now we know that there are at least three types of nothingness, the nothingness where all things simmer, the nothingness before that which is a pure vacuum with apparent zero force-energy interactions, and the raw nothingness which is the one that is wholly accessible to us even as we come from it, for it is a priori to anything else. Souls come after the vacuum, that is emotive energy as manifested may exist in the vacuum but it doesn’t personify as soul until after the vacuum comes into existence, the vacuum we can easily argue is boundless and endless for all practical observations, and it doesn’t have gender! I am just loving that, it doesn’t have gender.

The only thing we have to then answer is where then, in what physical consequence is the soul born, we know that there is a division of simmering essence nothingness and that gives rise to individual soul essence but where in the dimensional universe does that take place, and this is what the fascinating answer is, the moment space-time is born then soul essence is born too, because the soul essence is nothing more than a manifestation of time-space too, and how can that be, because time-space is in the vacuum as well, there has to be space-time in a vacuum, because the vacuum is presumably full and overflowing with Higgs Field particles, and the Higgs field itself sums zero or .0000000001 and right next to zero, that means it is not nothing it is simply as close to nothing as you can get without getting there!

Now the ether is a pretty neat thing and it has been in the supra-consciousness of our species for a little longer than the Higgs field in the form of the Ether, metaphysicians love the Ether and physicists love the Higgs field, but the end result is the same, it is everywhere even in the vacuum and while it appears to be nothing when something is put inside of the vacuum the whole thing comes dynamically to life in the form of dynamic-mass, force of interaction, we cannot see the Ether, we cannot see the vacuum, we might not even be able to detect the Higgs field particle but for one wonderful emotional thing, interaction! Interaction that defines everything by giving it gravitas.

We must now conclude that the vacuum is inside of us too, we must now conclude that the ether and the Higgs field is also within us because we have a soul and the soul is a constituent of space-time and so is your body. There is just one little problem with that, I like it and it sounds good and it probably works, but we are not scientists just because something works doesn’t mean that it is true, and we must go back because we don’t believe that sentient essence, emotive essence constitutes every aspect of the universe, it may constitute the superposition but it cannot in the end be in all things, choices are made, dynamics follow chaotic patterns that make decisions without predetermination, there is such a thing as a real unknown, and if we draw the simple and obvious conclusion that the vacuum is an endemic part of us and space-time then we are saying that we are everywhere and that we are everything and it is not the intent of this book or philosophy to be so closed minded, in fact one of the fundamental premises of this tome is that there isn’t anything special about us in the context of the essences that habit universe, so it would be contrarian to say so now, and we wont.

Instead what we are going to say is that we don’t have an out here, there is something that physically makes us part of everything that is matter and there is an emotive essence that is not fundamentally part of that all matter, and we don’t know how or when that judgment call is made in the context of essence representation. But the one thing that we do know is that matter and soul have severe and molestfull lines of demarcation between them, and we know this because we know that your brain doesn’t have a soul, your soul makes brain using constituencies of desire and matter, and it powers it up and it makes it think in the physical world, but remember that we know that matter as that which is represented by space-time energy representations is not wholly favorable to our representation in the pure material hence why it is so difficult to maintain body in the context of world, hence why we fall ill so frequently and easily, hence why it requires boundless work energy to survive and why it is easier to perish and why entropy appears so god damn predominant!

But soul is different, how is it different? It is emotive energy and so now we are going to say something else, the physical body cannot be natively emotive, your physical passions are part of space-time realizations, they are conjured out of a precarious base of conjectures which are not self sustainable, so that soul is paramount here, and soul would have some explaining to do in the matter of why it bothers with existence. But now we must go one step more complicated at what point then does this soul become gender oriented and let us say that here is a preordained axiom, the fact that soul has gender implies that soul like physical body has another priori that is more real than it, because any sort of division is not an evolution but a devolution from greater concepts, greater concepts always frame default parameters, that implies that they are not in any way able to contest’s their condition nor is anything else for that matter able to do contest it either, in such light the body matter, the body physical cannot challenge soul, its essence will invariably subtract itself back into soul matter, back into metaphysical constructs and it will do so by default.

It is thus obvious that the dichotomy of cosmic gender implies that there is something more substantive behind it all and that such is the more challenging of interests to our curiosity. We do not mean to imply here that wholeness is a mandatory prerequisite for all things, in fact we have observed that the universe as a whole and in its entirety is more of a concept than a giant squid, and we are going to say that the lines of male and female genders may be backwardly compatible to soul they could not possibly be backwardly compatible indefinitely, they would have to coalesce and/or cancel each other at some point in the history of time-space, as pure emotive essence in its simmering outpost is not gender based, further it is here postulated that gender comes to fruition after the initial primal scream manifestation from a simmering emotive into the frustrating differentiation of universe, that is we mean that even at the birth of essence representation in the context of time-space possibility we were represented as a singular essence and this is assumed because it requires too much energy to enter existence prime so that such energy coming in the form of a full fledge desire, will not be divided as that would be too costly for its manifestation, further we will add that in no conceivable construct of the simmering nothingness is there allowance for discrepancy such as those created by gender.

Since we have come to the conclusion that our emotive core essence is genderless we must now make a difficult assumption that gender comes to us as a result of environment, is not a fundamental construct of our essence being, it is the result of a reaction to environment, be it cosmic, universal, timed, space based the formidable conclusion is that gender is constructed out of a reaction with the environment, further we will make the case here that it is no different than having a polarity, as such are also constructs based on interactions and therefore similar in nature, you have a left and right hand, the concept of hands is just the same, the north and the south poles cannot extricate themselves from the concept of polarity, as such we will say that there is a primary feminine emotive tendency in the representation of sentient energy and that there is a subtracted masculine energetic expression, both which are predominantly feminine, meaning that the substantive essence default of all emotive creatures is a feminine construct and that some kind of hindering, some kind of reduction, a reflexive constriction creates a masculine observation.

In conclusion because we like to be clear, when you subtract all the environmental factors from sentient essence you get feminine essence as your default, only the environment can instigate and give birth to masculine essence but masculine essence in and of itself is an aberration of the feminine essence and we can say this with much certainty because all irrational processes are controlled by the feminine, those being the most difficult to control because they are incalculable and thus unpredictable; while all the masculine machinations are based on strategically determining environments and manipulating it accordingly. All localize functions belong to males all social and cosmic functions belong to the feminine. But the prime origins of all souls had to be feminine and after their first instances of existence they could have recycled themselves as masculine and thus given a post birth syndrome equal to masculinity. It could not have been otherwise.

Germination in any state would then principally require a feminine manifestation and more so any level of transcurrence from one state to another state, would have to condition any emotive transference through feminine assimilation; which is precisely why even a masculine-soul would require a feminine zygote so as to enter the material world, and why then the proper activation of masculine traits take place after successful entry into the womb is manifested.

The emotive universe is thus fundamentally feminine our somatic essence is feminine, the further back you go the closer you get to history without a masculine, and at some point there will be no traces of the environment and character driven “y”, and this is an elemental that we may count on, so it doesn’t matter to us what happens before the emotive comes into being because the emotive essence is equally feminine, when it came into being it came into being under a feminine standard, anything before it is irrelevant to our history; and critically it emancipates us from having to subject the emotive to a neutral essence, we will not be able to invest in such fancy because the fem-emotive cannot be deconstructed without taking sentient out of it, the implication is fascinating, we are biased and irrational and feminine from our most primordial origins, our history is the history of a fem-emotive-irrationality!

It is thus here stated feminine is all sentient essence and male is an injured part of feminine essence that reincarnated as such, but that injured part is the one that has come to greatest contact with the material, it is thus physical in nature and action based, while the feminine remains true to our native essence, it is thus optimally guided by aspects of our subconsciousness which are not observable but are more constructive in their guidance of species and humanity at large. Female actions are thus no lesser than male actions but indeed they are greater and more predominant however they are largely unobservable, though to the true feminine they must be very self fulfilling. For male satisfaction will always remain local for he can never default back to his feminine self, not while in the physical, and it appears that in the cosmic sense any transcurrence mandates a sort of temporary disembodiment of male gender that is not sustainable and will invariably revert to the forgone conclusion of maleness once transitions are done. If male souls can determinately and persistently deconstruct themselves into female essence it’s truly doubtful else why would they persist on being masculine.

Ricardo ©