Straight and Curved Spiraling Emotive
What does a person feel what does a person feel about others or can a person actually recognize feelings in others?
We start with the premise that all sentient essence is of the same fabric and one of the same throughout its entire corpus, even if there has been fragmentation all parts of the essence instantaneously communicate with all of its parts, and there are no distinctions between parts so as much as something that feels can detect feeling then it feels itself feeling, and has the ability to feel that in any condition of the feeling agent even as it has been disrupted by time and space dilations.
A person cannot feel themselves as an abstract, that is to say that a person cannot imagine themselves without feeling, any creative or even work functional aspects of a person are all based on a feeling that the person has realized or subjugated, in the case of realized it could be a passion and in the case of subjugation it could be a discipline, not forgetting that discipline too can equal a passion as has amply been demonstrated by passionate militaristic characters throughout history.
Any aspect recognition that a person has of themselves and of their environment and of others is inversely proportional to their capacity to feel themselves, the more you feel yourself the more you feel others, the less you feel yourself the less you feel others. In a particular case, the species has seen it as a benefit to have males, that is sentient beings with less potential to feel, that is with a curved emotive so that they can manage harsh environments, males are thus more capable of destruction because they are apparently unfeeling and thus creatively ruthless, but such is not the case, they are in fact destructive because their ability to feel has been curved and so they become violent in order to feel, that is they are trying to find the straightest path to feeling, they are trying to break the limitations of their feelings, something which is acknowledge by their endemic feminine subconscious but cannot be acknowledge by their overt masculine characteristic.
A person then has a two step process for feeling dynamic, one is masculine one is feminine, the humanity has an aspect feel potential differential for both, masculine have curved guidelines for feeling and feminine are allowed to roam free sort of speak as much as they can match their potential without coming to harm from the abstract environment. Both women and men do feel differently and their manifestations are thus different because of the curvature of their feeling potential, a woman can feel in a sort of straight line that is always forward, upward and towards infinity, a male will feel like a curved line that continues to weigh upon itself the more it feels until it finally collapses from seeing its own feelings dangling in front of him.
A person can and will feel others then in relationship to their gender bias, men will feel more the systemic relationships, that is those that can be constructed externally for they see their feelings remote, while women will be perceptive to the social or those that can be felt internally as their feelings are inward and thus a cumulative heap. The association of masculine to feeling is thus external and subject to degree of exhilaration while feminine association will be internal and based largely on emotive tonality, that is inward cohesiveness. This also implies correctly that males entice happiness while women may suffer joy.
There is a supra association that determines all social and civic feeling potential and dynamic. We mean by this that the unison of male-curved-emotive, and female-straight-emotive, will spiral around each other to give the aural presence to the overall feeling potential of the given, relationship, family, group, tribe, culture, society, nation, and civilization culminating in the unison humanity, all which in their own spheres may manifest different emotive quantifications based on the realized potentials of the Straight and Curved Spiraling Emotive. SCSE.
The entire scope of any of these particulars being able to feel themselves or one another is derived from how the emotive manifestations intersect with one another to cumulative effect, and thus as a whole they hold each other captive which is why few if any can escape their times.
It is then possible for us to feel ourselves, and another but only in an inverse absolute, that is how much are we willing to feel, how much are we prepared to stomach the consequences of feeling as a whole, and there are minor discrepancies between the feeling potential of a given group and the individual, that is to say that generally individuals will have marginal and diminutive control of their ability to feel themselves and by consequence one another.
Now regardless of how the manifestation of emotive essence represents itself in the material world the whole of it is based on a prime-emotive, and it will behave always as if it were trying to construct an emotive world, to feel more, to touch more, towards greater expression, this is because the horizon of all sentient beings is emotive, it is ultimately inward looking towards the essence which gave us all our prime desire to exists. And the pretty irony here is that none of the emotive parts seeking to see out there what is within are not going to find it because out there is space and time.
We start with the premise that all sentient essence is of the same fabric and one of the same throughout its entire corpus, even if there has been fragmentation all parts of the essence instantaneously communicate with all of its parts, and there are no distinctions between parts so as much as something that feels can detect feeling then it feels itself feeling, and has the ability to feel that in any condition of the feeling agent even as it has been disrupted by time and space dilations.
A person cannot feel themselves as an abstract, that is to say that a person cannot imagine themselves without feeling, any creative or even work functional aspects of a person are all based on a feeling that the person has realized or subjugated, in the case of realized it could be a passion and in the case of subjugation it could be a discipline, not forgetting that discipline too can equal a passion as has amply been demonstrated by passionate militaristic characters throughout history.
Any aspect recognition that a person has of themselves and of their environment and of others is inversely proportional to their capacity to feel themselves, the more you feel yourself the more you feel others, the less you feel yourself the less you feel others. In a particular case, the species has seen it as a benefit to have males, that is sentient beings with less potential to feel, that is with a curved emotive so that they can manage harsh environments, males are thus more capable of destruction because they are apparently unfeeling and thus creatively ruthless, but such is not the case, they are in fact destructive because their ability to feel has been curved and so they become violent in order to feel, that is they are trying to find the straightest path to feeling, they are trying to break the limitations of their feelings, something which is acknowledge by their endemic feminine subconscious but cannot be acknowledge by their overt masculine characteristic.
A person then has a two step process for feeling dynamic, one is masculine one is feminine, the humanity has an aspect feel potential differential for both, masculine have curved guidelines for feeling and feminine are allowed to roam free sort of speak as much as they can match their potential without coming to harm from the abstract environment. Both women and men do feel differently and their manifestations are thus different because of the curvature of their feeling potential, a woman can feel in a sort of straight line that is always forward, upward and towards infinity, a male will feel like a curved line that continues to weigh upon itself the more it feels until it finally collapses from seeing its own feelings dangling in front of him.
A person can and will feel others then in relationship to their gender bias, men will feel more the systemic relationships, that is those that can be constructed externally for they see their feelings remote, while women will be perceptive to the social or those that can be felt internally as their feelings are inward and thus a cumulative heap. The association of masculine to feeling is thus external and subject to degree of exhilaration while feminine association will be internal and based largely on emotive tonality, that is inward cohesiveness. This also implies correctly that males entice happiness while women may suffer joy.
There is a supra association that determines all social and civic feeling potential and dynamic. We mean by this that the unison of male-curved-emotive, and female-straight-emotive, will spiral around each other to give the aural presence to the overall feeling potential of the given, relationship, family, group, tribe, culture, society, nation, and civilization culminating in the unison humanity, all which in their own spheres may manifest different emotive quantifications based on the realized potentials of the Straight and Curved Spiraling Emotive. SCSE.
The entire scope of any of these particulars being able to feel themselves or one another is derived from how the emotive manifestations intersect with one another to cumulative effect, and thus as a whole they hold each other captive which is why few if any can escape their times.
It is then possible for us to feel ourselves, and another but only in an inverse absolute, that is how much are we willing to feel, how much are we prepared to stomach the consequences of feeling as a whole, and there are minor discrepancies between the feeling potential of a given group and the individual, that is to say that generally individuals will have marginal and diminutive control of their ability to feel themselves and by consequence one another.
Now regardless of how the manifestation of emotive essence represents itself in the material world the whole of it is based on a prime-emotive, and it will behave always as if it were trying to construct an emotive world, to feel more, to touch more, towards greater expression, this is because the horizon of all sentient beings is emotive, it is ultimately inward looking towards the essence which gave us all our prime desire to exists. And the pretty irony here is that none of the emotive parts seeking to see out there what is within are not going to find it because out there is space and time.
posted by Ricardo Correa at 12:00 PM
<< Home