Actualized, Non Actualized and First Spirits

I think we have to think of the self and the self in relationship to the aspect of reincarnation, a troubling process because a lot of people don't believe in reincarnation even as they themselves are reincarnated, that is of course most of them; but that is also not to say that there aren't people that aren't reincarnated, there are "first spirits," and there are "actualized spirits," and then there are spirits that are "none actualized," and so you have these significant variances and they cease to be wholly significant because the very types that you would address on the matter do not themselves believe in it. And that they don't is in fact a sign of good health in their part as it serves no purpose, in this or most any other life to remember all your other lives. Of course we can assume that a god for instance is someone that remembers all his other lives, which would logically include any and all the life of others, you and I and so forth. And we can correctly assume that anyone that remembers more than one life is a being that has reached some form of self realization, and from there it follows that one can acquire the wisdom to deal with the realism brought about my remembrance of things pasts, specially because if you have had more than one life, your very uniqueness is brought into question, I mean which you are you going to like?

Also I think it important to mention this, it is also necessary to take into account that there are individuals that are fully realized even though they do not remember their previous existences, usually these beings are fully realized within a singular existence because they are not at war or shall we say in conflict with their essence being nature as it reflects through present, past or future. These beings can be distinguished because of their certainty of self, however it is difficult to opt to be this type of being, or it might not be desirable for any given set of probable life variables.

We shall thus discuss the aspect of our being then from a more narrowly defined perspective, that is from the aspect of the temporal life that you and we are happening to be experiencing at this time, and hope somehow that that will draw some kind of binary correlation that might be sustainable not only in real life but also in our minds.

In the first we must just put it bluntly, there are people that are born in their times such are the common folk for they don’t have to think about the way they go about their lives; there are people that are born before their times such as prophets or philosophers and they have to thnk and think hard to realize their lives; and there are people that are born after their times such as are historians and diplomats and they can mostly relax as theya re living a priori and just recollecting or acting upon collectables.

The most common is people that are born in their times, these by nature would tend to be the common folk, usually termed as the masses and it could be any of us all, generally what defines the mass is obviously what appears to be their complacency, which it isn’t really, they actually work harder than anyone to produce the modern, or real time current world where all visionaries and archivists must stand upon, but because they, the masses, are usually in agreement with current world affairs or the status quo, and have no incoherence with it, they accept it precisely as it is for what it is, and have not an inkling of an itch to want radical change, fact is they don't want change at all, even if their lot is in a slum or ghetto they are still likely to continue such existence rather than struggle against it. And frankly why would they want to change something that is wholly in agreement with their state of being and their essence priori, they wouldn't. It is only the academics and the visionaries that see the mass as complacent and yet none of them work harder than it to produce and super impose reality upon as all, a must mass for any historian or visionary to process their ridiculous idealisms or philosophies.

The historians love the past because they were born in the tail end or well beyond their times such as paleontologists; historians for their part are gifted at figuring out what happened before, they sense it, they feel it, they have a good ability to intuit historical happenings; people born after their times are easily discerned as anthropologists or evolutionary scientists, or as bureaucrats that can think a memo innovative. They will always be a step behind and they will equally be more gifted at capitalizing on the steady moment to be captured, the none moving participle. These group also comprises a much to be admired lot, the diplomats; they are naturally given to diplomacy because of their sense of history, nothing but a profound insight into the folly and grandeur of history makes a diplomatic essence, and it is magnificent to watch how they are quick to assume a neutral posture in exchange for a trifle piddling, it is in their habit sensitive anachronistic nature to do so.

We come to those born before their time, there are the prophets oh these are a fine lot, you can pile them in with the futurist and even with the optimist or visionaries, no sense of history, no archival fact faults them or slows them down, they have little insight into the pasts and much less into the present which to them is mostly a hindrance, they live for the future and will work aimlessly and tirelessly towards seemingly unobtainable or unrewarding objectives, posterity needs to be greatfull to this lot even as it is the masses that cater to present day reality that cuddle these unfortunates. Obviously in this lot you find a great many, the optimism makes the bull market and the collector of classics, arts, stamps or any other fodder is fully funded on future prospects; consumerism, savagely musters a great deal of faith in an ever reoccurring fountain of finance; and then there are the prophets, that basically count on tomorrow being here, on the earth not dying out from a sudden whatever disruption, the prophets not only bank on the future they dare to predict its outcome, and glory in their tenacity which generally undermines the common or shall we more appropriately call it the current good; why everyone that believes in the future will invariably undermine the present will invariably be a premature future entity.

Now the mass, as much as we want to say something on their behalf there is not much to say as the very idea of "mass" subordinates any demarcation, after all who inst a member of the mass, why even a prophet and a diplomat have to pay rent and utility and transport and medical bills and so they are largely somehow or other tied to the bloody deed of daily existence from which they will generally profit little. But this serves to point to a degree in any of us to be a member of the present, with greater or not tendencies towards the future or past based on our birth occurrence, which may indeed have a bit of folly in it.

Now we have mentioned three character types, those in the mass aggregate that habit the here and now, those in the least great majority that leave in the past, and are therefore conservative, and those in the least of all majority that is all those that live for posterity and have essence types that branch towards the predictive outcome.

It is not however something, as you might imagine predicated on the here and now, it is instead based on their essence priori, that is where they were before their essence manifested into the corporeal body being. Essence as we have said is all-emotive but then there is experienced essence and none experienced essence and then there is essence that has simply experienced something completely different and thus might appear wholly inexperienced thought it isn’t. We shall thus speak of each here according to their categorical alignment.

First spirits are those that come into being for the very first time that is that they never existed in a corporeal physical form and have thus no memory to be had of it and no experience in it. Obviously they will be naive, they just don't know and will just generally not get this life, it takes a couple of times on earth to get it, "firsts spirits" will generally be at a loss, they will make for wonderful poets, musicians, actors, comics, for everything will be so hurtful to them, so primitive, so barbarous, and then there will be others that will make for great movie stars, equally naive but completely thoughtless, based on pure impulse and given to sycophantic attraction because they want to be liked and accepted, obsessive energy their must, but they shall do well when things go well for them but mostly tragic when it goes tragic for them as events, perhaps because of entropy, tend to favor tragic ends, and so many of these will just end up being boring romantics.

None actualized spirits will invariably be spirits that have been around for a while in the general cosmic background, that is that they will have other aspects of representations tied to their essence representation but they will not have manifested on the earth and so they will generally not be precisely a fit, more at odds with the world but will surely have something original to contribute, they will tend to be geniuses, or unique and insightful as leaders or eccentric inventors, this because of their alternate dimensional experience, which allows them to see not only the greater picture but possible outcomes. They will not feel that they belong, life will be generally easy to none actualized spirits, but it will generally be lonely as they will not have a lot in common with the lot except for the obvious fact that they set the premises of future agendas and will suffer preferential treatment for it, while being emotional recluses and socially avoided or miss trusted as misunderstood.

Actualized spirits are obviously the norm, they will have spent a few life times on earth and will not be at great conflict with it, the world will mostly make sense to them and they will just repeat the process of existence without much a do about it, however they will also neglect to acknowledge a great many deeds and be blind to many misdeeds perpetrated against them, by others or even by their own actions, this is the lot that could drop a bomb on another human being and not see any karma-boomerang effect from it, this is the type that will execute the orders give them without flinching and even give the orders themselves; for this lot remorse from a moral perspective is a reconcilable variable, in other words their moral or religious view, and its commandments will allow for variance in behaviors creating a manageable work and live ethic.

Whether or not you are bound or belong to your times is the tough questions, the matter is that timing in the universe is a tough act, there are only so many windows of opportunity to be born, there are only so many options to get the right parents, and even if you pick the right parents and the right era you could still end up in the wrong geography because your timing of reentry into the earth could be muscled by random circumstance, and so the predicate of your existence is based on many subtleties, and some not so subtle outcomes.

The general rule is: if you have lived many lives and you are being reincarnated at the time of the manifestation for a principle that was just in its gestation phase in your last life, then you will fare well because you will have been subjected to a primer of the abject elements in its primordial state, and you will then be born into your time, you will have an intuitable comprehension of the goings and happenings, and will innately react to them without thinking and thus you will have an advantage in such a climate.

If you are born before your times, that is preempted into a world where you don't belong you will be generally discombobulated, you will try to change it, and you might just bring change to it, even if it is through destruction, otherwise you will just be damn good at predicting the future, something that you will always miss out on, just by a little bit.

And finally if you are born after your times, you will be all right, a worse case scenario makes you a conservative, a reactionary, a protectionists, and a best-case scenario an anthropologist, biologist, ecologists and even a wonderful historians.