Subconsciousness As An Observable Object
It would be wrong and heavily so to say that subconsciousness can be an isolated constituency we will not say it here because it cannot be said based on any principled philosophy, that is to say that any philosophy that may say that there are things isolated within other things in the context of being or in the context of universe is in the very same sense appropriately wrong and very wrong because the universe doesn’t understand barriers, it doesn’t understand demarcation, even the nothingness lives within us in all of its constructs, even as you manifest yourself as you and the character you that you are it doesn’t follow that the universe thinks you an independent and glad you ought be that you are not considered such because in the end everything you consume is a shared waterhole for all beings.
It can also be stated that all context of being, existence, position and time is all interposed within a same context reality, that is that reality is prepared to assume any context and to embody any context even as it shows only one property of a given context. In fact here we better be very clear, reality is part of a superposition, it doesn’t so much care what it manifests it cares more that what it manifests wants and is willing to persists in whatever context of existence it has defined itself, and it ought then not surprise you that reality is a superposition anymore than it should not surprise you that reality is the manifestation of a coherent object that has gone through decoherence, and yet you ought be surprised that reality is in fact a subconsciousness!
It is perhaps one of the amazing things that there can be something as overt as reality representative of a fundamental subconsciousness, which forces the question can a subconsciousness be so overt? The answer as ever is yes and no, reality is a subconsciousness in that it supports a given criteria not for one specific thing or machination but for a given range of things, beings and machinations, that is to say that you can see a subconsciousness in action in reality because in order for it to recognize you, you must function as a real thing, being or even faction. That generally implies that there must be consequences to your existence being an object-event. It is easy to tie all these together because they cannot be dismembered, an object is a being of sorts, like it or not being is not just a concept of I am alive, for it is being also as a concept of I effect your existence, further it follows that an object and a being share one thing in common, that is action-event, and action has to be interpreted as an event in the context of space-time, that is to say, the difference of object, being and event in the context of existence is none, they all participate in each others lives and all serve to markup each others definitions.
As such we can then say that reality demarcates a subconsciousness because it must be silently understood by object, being and event in whatever guise their machinations opt to represent themselves or interact with one another. Further it must clearly be understood that all things given to reality will react according to the reality thus it is profusely impossible for anyone within the context of a reality to think out of the box, a reality is in fact supported by inward thinking and a repetition of that thinking into infinity or some awkward terminality.
It is then possible to see a subconsciousness as an overt entity and yet not be able to see it at all. This because as you can well see reality doesn’t mean that you can see how that reality endemically behaves to police its subject beings nor how it forces an interpretation of event consequences so that say the planets are forced to circle the sun, you are forced to stay with your husband, and turtles have to go to a particular beach to lay their eggs, all of which are varying circumstances of a mandated reality that has to ferment itself on the basis of a subconsciousness/reality that cannot be discerned. It is at once obvious, observable and impossible to define.
ricardo (c)
It can also be stated that all context of being, existence, position and time is all interposed within a same context reality, that is that reality is prepared to assume any context and to embody any context even as it shows only one property of a given context. In fact here we better be very clear, reality is part of a superposition, it doesn’t so much care what it manifests it cares more that what it manifests wants and is willing to persists in whatever context of existence it has defined itself, and it ought then not surprise you that reality is a superposition anymore than it should not surprise you that reality is the manifestation of a coherent object that has gone through decoherence, and yet you ought be surprised that reality is in fact a subconsciousness!
It is perhaps one of the amazing things that there can be something as overt as reality representative of a fundamental subconsciousness, which forces the question can a subconsciousness be so overt? The answer as ever is yes and no, reality is a subconsciousness in that it supports a given criteria not for one specific thing or machination but for a given range of things, beings and machinations, that is to say that you can see a subconsciousness in action in reality because in order for it to recognize you, you must function as a real thing, being or even faction. That generally implies that there must be consequences to your existence being an object-event. It is easy to tie all these together because they cannot be dismembered, an object is a being of sorts, like it or not being is not just a concept of I am alive, for it is being also as a concept of I effect your existence, further it follows that an object and a being share one thing in common, that is action-event, and action has to be interpreted as an event in the context of space-time, that is to say, the difference of object, being and event in the context of existence is none, they all participate in each others lives and all serve to markup each others definitions.
As such we can then say that reality demarcates a subconsciousness because it must be silently understood by object, being and event in whatever guise their machinations opt to represent themselves or interact with one another. Further it must clearly be understood that all things given to reality will react according to the reality thus it is profusely impossible for anyone within the context of a reality to think out of the box, a reality is in fact supported by inward thinking and a repetition of that thinking into infinity or some awkward terminality.
It is then possible to see a subconsciousness as an overt entity and yet not be able to see it at all. This because as you can well see reality doesn’t mean that you can see how that reality endemically behaves to police its subject beings nor how it forces an interpretation of event consequences so that say the planets are forced to circle the sun, you are forced to stay with your husband, and turtles have to go to a particular beach to lay their eggs, all of which are varying circumstances of a mandated reality that has to ferment itself on the basis of a subconsciousness/reality that cannot be discerned. It is at once obvious, observable and impossible to define.
ricardo (c)
posted by Ricardo Correa at 5:19 PM
<< Home