Only 90% Of You Dies In Time-Space
We must now walk a little more deeply into the entrenchment that becomes the material reality, is there something really to like about it besides the incessant definition? There has to be something else that keeps us machining towards the reality of being in the context of space time but what is it that we found so interesting, the question is incessant and begets more and more questions until we don’t have an answer, we are not going to beat around the bush, there is no way that the existence to tell us what attributes of it are such that we find them irresistible, the reader is not going to like that, it is too easy to say we don’t know, and equally unsatisfying as an answer and you are reading this trying to discern some aspect value, and then I say well we don’t know, but I think you ought be pleased that that doesn’t mean that there isn’t any value, and it may even please you more why we know that there is that value, because even though our existence is short lived it is allowed and that it is allowed is the amazing and wonderful thing, if there wasn’t some conditional value the existence in being and time is not permitted, thus by the fact that we last a few years on the eternal universe ought be pleasing to us, it means either of two things that it takes the universe some time to realize that there is a foreign agent of pure essence within it and thus it takes it a while to kill us, thus the life expectancy might be define, or the species itself might exist for only as long as it can fake its way in the universe. Two it is entirely possible that since we sum a value of say 1, which seems the bare minimum that the universe would observe into existence for you can only fraction after being born and not before, then it reasons that we might exist in the universe because we sum as one of its parts and that the universe values eclectic appearances, and equally it admires persistence, you don’t get here because you are not trying to be here, the hardest thing to be is an entity in the context of universe, bare in mind that everything in the universe scrapes the organizational energy out of everything else. Energy tends to disperse and simmer, we know that, but the universe has a bet on the contrary, form through persistence and renovation, the universe is a cycle of incessant repairs always manifested by its continued grandness as a fact of us all and everything.
Now let us backtrack to idealism, the whole of the universe has a negative outlook on it, idealism is the pure essence, and once it enters the universe the pure essence doesn’t need idealism any more, so it doesn’t really need the truth, in fact what it does need is to fully realize its pure energy constituency in the universe, this is fascinating, the entire migratory essence wants to get the rest of itself into this universe, isn’t that something fascinating, you don’t want to imagine how long it could have taken pure essence to become pure essence, it might have been eternities, but then pure essence discovers that that was all folly and so distinguishes itself, as all type essences must by making an appearance in universe, and even though the universe is not a natural habitat the essence persists towards it, even as its life expectancy in it is one of the most limited and seemingly pointless.
Now since the life time continues to be punctuated there is always a bit of an issue if you cannot keep your place here for long that means that you cannot amass time, but you can amass space, time amassification seems gloriously difficult, but space amassification seems wholly doable, the case of reproduction, might just be that result, a quantification of our energy in the mass of dimensional space, it seems easy enough to do, the universe appears not to mine if more of us are born as it doesn’t appear to increase the entropy process, in fact it appears to remain a fixed constant, it pretty much takes us all about the same amount time to get destroyed in space time, a decade less or a decade more doesn’t really register any significant change, and so there you have it, we amass as the only possible way of growing, the serious restriction is in time, and mind you that there are rumors that once we lived 300 to 600 years, but was that true really? Well it is possible if it took the universe some time to realize we were there, but also there is the turtle that will live 150 to 200 years and still it does this even as it is part of our emotive essence type, so it does appear that there are certain circumstances which allow for interesting degrees of longevity so the bigger question is why haven’t we seen that become part of our lives, a longer life span.
I will propose though I don’t claim any certainty in this matters that the lesser life span is actually a problem of the youth ingrained migration into space-time, we have a propensity to die fast and live short lives because most of us are still coherently oriented towards pure-essence, we are thus living the conditions of the here and now based on a significant amount of input from far/far types that have no interest at looking forward in space time but rather continue to move or at least behave as spiritual essence beings and have idealized pure essence existence, heaven you know comes at us from such an angle, thus to some degree and there is no way to tell how much that is, to some degree we are in fact culling our own existence with the idealisms of pure essence and we are ingrained desire to return to the idealized state that we escaped. It doesn’t make much sense but then again it does, any escape condition was bound to be less natural than the habitat of pure essence types, thus it is not without some hard pounding love for our pure essence that we sort of short span our lives here, we are still short-circuiting ourselves, and what is more fascinating part of us doesn’t want to escape, a large part of us doesn’t want to escape, and this is because in pure essence we don’t need to know, we don’t need brains, we largely just are, and there are no questions, and from that to come into the unknown, fully aware that it may destroy us, yikes.
This of course is not to say that we will not be able to overcome this distrust of the here and now, nor does it mean that the here and now will not find something to like about us, perhaps we are the idea of “consciousness” that must have some interesting elements for the idea of universe, how they will multiply within its constructs, or whether we manage to make pure essence accept the universe is all that fascinating, but there remains one more issue, it is the problem of mass and time as related to pure essence, mass and time are not native to pure essence because in pure essence everything sums precisely zero, though if you look at the whole essence being it would certainly accomplish a 1 formation, but the problem is that the pure essence doesn’t realize that value, so the value of 1 is really nothing more than a potential part of superposition for pure essence observes nothing about itself.
And perhaps there is no greater problem than the transference of pure energy into matter energy, it has to be insignificant as a whole, there is got to be very little pure energy that can be made into matter energy, and the evidence is that most matter is conceptually dead, void of emotive essence, this is not to say that matter doesn’t feel or that it isn’t part of the emotive essence, but consider something organic like a tree, most of a tree is dead, only about 15 to 20 percent of a tree is alive with emotive energy, it is even possible to say that most of the cells and microorganism that you are composed are mostly dead or dying, and that at any given point you are no more than a walking zombie were it not for the fact that you keep drinking water and eating to replace the rampant death machination that is your body natural.
So there could be another assumption here that the transference from pure essence energy is but only partially successful, in the transferences a lot of pure essence energy calcifies in the here and now and might be the source of most inert matter. Certainly carbon appears to have lots in common with emotive energy beings, thus you can pretty much surmise that they are one of the same. And it follows that the universe, at least the visible portion might be the tragic result of failed emotive energy or and other pure essence types solidifying in the here and now, of course when we move forward to survive in the here and now we don’t recognize that material universe as another aspect of our being, a codified aspect and solid none the less.
You can then imagine what the cosmic implication, cosmic as in global, that it is possible that the dead matter we see out there is our failed attempt at transferring our pure essence type into the universal spat. But that idea has an immediate reflection issue, it implies that we are everything, even the dead matter is us and constitutes a truly dead version of ourselves, by truly dead we don’t mean truly dead as a rock, sand and a meteor all have energy, else they would not matter as matter if they didn’t, thus matter matters because it has energy, the larger question there is, is that energy in any way circumscribed as emotive energy, does a rock feel, when a rock feels how do you know it feels or is the representation of rock wholly voided of feeling, or there is still the probably more correct assumption that the rock is composed of some other pure essence entity that has nothing to do with emotive feeling, and that in fact the rock dies and is hardened by the construct of contradictions within the emotive universe.
First I think it is wholly wrong to suppose that emotive essence is the fundamental and thus that anything you see is hardened emotion, a rock is thus able to hit you because it knows who you are, this much is true, a rock identifies with you and borders your essences so that it can stumble upon your head, that is emotive energy at work, a rock has to be able to feel that you are a hardened surface, that there is a trajectory to you and that it can be triangulated and maintained, that is all emotive activism, what isn’t true is that everything a rock is, is emotive energy, it isn’t, in fact about 90 percent of a rock doesn’t feel, and why it doesn’t feel is because the rock is also made of other essence types that may have not relationship to emotive energy, still in that 10 percent emotive energy there is enough energy to hit you over the head and knock you unconscious, the recognition is a same type recognition and the same could happen to another emotive energy, there you have it.
What all these critically implies is that the convergence of pure essence types has a detrimental effect on the success of any pure essence because it constricts it, and in fact kills it, that there might be 10 percent of us in a solid rock equally implies that it is composed of other entity types and that they too have hardened as they came into contact with the universe and through it with us, the rock will invariably recognize all the entity types that constitute it, but as you can see that doesn’t imply good things, it means that a rock has become a third entity that it is not recognizable by any of its constituent parts and yet that it has the ability to hinder any of those parts in any number of caustic reactions.
That of course can explain a lot of things, but I think for now we can leave it at that, with only one minor note, the migration to the material world murders pure essence energy, and we don’t know if that can ever return, we can argue that the voyage into universe burns up 90 percent of a pure essence type, and that 90 percent becomes trapped in an unidentifiable element that eventually comprises a largely unrecognizable universe.
We can say that with 90 percent certainty so while we cannot say what is there to like about that pyrrhic victory we can assure you that it is blindly worthy, Good day.
ricardo
Now let us backtrack to idealism, the whole of the universe has a negative outlook on it, idealism is the pure essence, and once it enters the universe the pure essence doesn’t need idealism any more, so it doesn’t really need the truth, in fact what it does need is to fully realize its pure energy constituency in the universe, this is fascinating, the entire migratory essence wants to get the rest of itself into this universe, isn’t that something fascinating, you don’t want to imagine how long it could have taken pure essence to become pure essence, it might have been eternities, but then pure essence discovers that that was all folly and so distinguishes itself, as all type essences must by making an appearance in universe, and even though the universe is not a natural habitat the essence persists towards it, even as its life expectancy in it is one of the most limited and seemingly pointless.
Now since the life time continues to be punctuated there is always a bit of an issue if you cannot keep your place here for long that means that you cannot amass time, but you can amass space, time amassification seems gloriously difficult, but space amassification seems wholly doable, the case of reproduction, might just be that result, a quantification of our energy in the mass of dimensional space, it seems easy enough to do, the universe appears not to mine if more of us are born as it doesn’t appear to increase the entropy process, in fact it appears to remain a fixed constant, it pretty much takes us all about the same amount time to get destroyed in space time, a decade less or a decade more doesn’t really register any significant change, and so there you have it, we amass as the only possible way of growing, the serious restriction is in time, and mind you that there are rumors that once we lived 300 to 600 years, but was that true really? Well it is possible if it took the universe some time to realize we were there, but also there is the turtle that will live 150 to 200 years and still it does this even as it is part of our emotive essence type, so it does appear that there are certain circumstances which allow for interesting degrees of longevity so the bigger question is why haven’t we seen that become part of our lives, a longer life span.
I will propose though I don’t claim any certainty in this matters that the lesser life span is actually a problem of the youth ingrained migration into space-time, we have a propensity to die fast and live short lives because most of us are still coherently oriented towards pure-essence, we are thus living the conditions of the here and now based on a significant amount of input from far/far types that have no interest at looking forward in space time but rather continue to move or at least behave as spiritual essence beings and have idealized pure essence existence, heaven you know comes at us from such an angle, thus to some degree and there is no way to tell how much that is, to some degree we are in fact culling our own existence with the idealisms of pure essence and we are ingrained desire to return to the idealized state that we escaped. It doesn’t make much sense but then again it does, any escape condition was bound to be less natural than the habitat of pure essence types, thus it is not without some hard pounding love for our pure essence that we sort of short span our lives here, we are still short-circuiting ourselves, and what is more fascinating part of us doesn’t want to escape, a large part of us doesn’t want to escape, and this is because in pure essence we don’t need to know, we don’t need brains, we largely just are, and there are no questions, and from that to come into the unknown, fully aware that it may destroy us, yikes.
This of course is not to say that we will not be able to overcome this distrust of the here and now, nor does it mean that the here and now will not find something to like about us, perhaps we are the idea of “consciousness” that must have some interesting elements for the idea of universe, how they will multiply within its constructs, or whether we manage to make pure essence accept the universe is all that fascinating, but there remains one more issue, it is the problem of mass and time as related to pure essence, mass and time are not native to pure essence because in pure essence everything sums precisely zero, though if you look at the whole essence being it would certainly accomplish a 1 formation, but the problem is that the pure essence doesn’t realize that value, so the value of 1 is really nothing more than a potential part of superposition for pure essence observes nothing about itself.
And perhaps there is no greater problem than the transference of pure energy into matter energy, it has to be insignificant as a whole, there is got to be very little pure energy that can be made into matter energy, and the evidence is that most matter is conceptually dead, void of emotive essence, this is not to say that matter doesn’t feel or that it isn’t part of the emotive essence, but consider something organic like a tree, most of a tree is dead, only about 15 to 20 percent of a tree is alive with emotive energy, it is even possible to say that most of the cells and microorganism that you are composed are mostly dead or dying, and that at any given point you are no more than a walking zombie were it not for the fact that you keep drinking water and eating to replace the rampant death machination that is your body natural.
So there could be another assumption here that the transference from pure essence energy is but only partially successful, in the transferences a lot of pure essence energy calcifies in the here and now and might be the source of most inert matter. Certainly carbon appears to have lots in common with emotive energy beings, thus you can pretty much surmise that they are one of the same. And it follows that the universe, at least the visible portion might be the tragic result of failed emotive energy or and other pure essence types solidifying in the here and now, of course when we move forward to survive in the here and now we don’t recognize that material universe as another aspect of our being, a codified aspect and solid none the less.
You can then imagine what the cosmic implication, cosmic as in global, that it is possible that the dead matter we see out there is our failed attempt at transferring our pure essence type into the universal spat. But that idea has an immediate reflection issue, it implies that we are everything, even the dead matter is us and constitutes a truly dead version of ourselves, by truly dead we don’t mean truly dead as a rock, sand and a meteor all have energy, else they would not matter as matter if they didn’t, thus matter matters because it has energy, the larger question there is, is that energy in any way circumscribed as emotive energy, does a rock feel, when a rock feels how do you know it feels or is the representation of rock wholly voided of feeling, or there is still the probably more correct assumption that the rock is composed of some other pure essence entity that has nothing to do with emotive feeling, and that in fact the rock dies and is hardened by the construct of contradictions within the emotive universe.
First I think it is wholly wrong to suppose that emotive essence is the fundamental and thus that anything you see is hardened emotion, a rock is thus able to hit you because it knows who you are, this much is true, a rock identifies with you and borders your essences so that it can stumble upon your head, that is emotive energy at work, a rock has to be able to feel that you are a hardened surface, that there is a trajectory to you and that it can be triangulated and maintained, that is all emotive activism, what isn’t true is that everything a rock is, is emotive energy, it isn’t, in fact about 90 percent of a rock doesn’t feel, and why it doesn’t feel is because the rock is also made of other essence types that may have not relationship to emotive energy, still in that 10 percent emotive energy there is enough energy to hit you over the head and knock you unconscious, the recognition is a same type recognition and the same could happen to another emotive energy, there you have it.
What all these critically implies is that the convergence of pure essence types has a detrimental effect on the success of any pure essence because it constricts it, and in fact kills it, that there might be 10 percent of us in a solid rock equally implies that it is composed of other entity types and that they too have hardened as they came into contact with the universe and through it with us, the rock will invariably recognize all the entity types that constitute it, but as you can see that doesn’t imply good things, it means that a rock has become a third entity that it is not recognizable by any of its constituent parts and yet that it has the ability to hinder any of those parts in any number of caustic reactions.
That of course can explain a lot of things, but I think for now we can leave it at that, with only one minor note, the migration to the material world murders pure essence energy, and we don’t know if that can ever return, we can argue that the voyage into universe burns up 90 percent of a pure essence type, and that 90 percent becomes trapped in an unidentifiable element that eventually comprises a largely unrecognizable universe.
We can say that with 90 percent certainty so while we cannot say what is there to like about that pyrrhic victory we can assure you that it is blindly worthy, Good day.
ricardo
posted by Ricardo Correa at 8:54 AM
<< Home